Meat Or Medication: Antibiotic Resistance Is Proof That Meat Profits Matter More Than Human Health

November 17, 2021

Agricultural pharmacology's impact on human health

By Hayley Cloona


The
accidental discovery of penicillin by Alexandar Flemming in 1928  spurred the development of antibiotics, which have saved millions of lives and extended life expectancy across the globe. These precious medical inventions allow doctors to treat bacterial infections that cause various illnesses ranging from a sore throat to tuberculosis and deadly pneumonia


Yet decades after the first lives were saved by these miracle drugs, bacterial infections are once again a major threat to human life. The rapid emergence of
antibiotic-resistant bacteria is occurring at an alarming rate worldwide and is caused by misuse of these drugs in human medicine and animal husbandry. While misuse in humans stems from a lack of public awareness around the applications of antibiotics, the animal agricultural industry knowingly abuses these medications at the cost of long-term human health and food security. 


Reimagine Agriculture is highly concerned about the dangers of antibiotic resistance from meat production. We want to educate the public on this widely ignored and (sadly) denied problem within our food systems so that they can make educated decisions about their consumption habits. 


What is antibiotic resistance, and why does it occur?


Antibiotic resistance occurs when bacteria
develop the ability to survive the drugs designed to kill them. Bacteria mutate upon repeated and frequent exposure to antibiotic medications through generational natural selection. This means that bacterium not affected by a course of antibiotics will spread their resistant genes onto the next generation of bacteria. Such generational resistance allows bacteria to quickly become immune to some of the strongest antibiotic medications in existence. 


Similarly, spontaneous mutations can also occur. This is because bacteria reproduce by creating a copy of themselves and their DNA. While replicating their genetic material,
mutations can occur, meaning the new bacterium is stronger than the last. Both spontaneous and naturally selected mutations are swift and effective. Once a single bacterium is immune, a resistant population quickly grows as bacterium reproduce asexually every 4 to 20 minutes


How is antibiotic resistance linked to animal agriculture? 


As we just learned,
every time antibiotics are used new antibiotic-resistant bacteria are created. This amplifies the fact that the majority of antibiotic use occurs in agricultural settings. These medications are used for various reasons in the production of animal products, including; beef, pork, chicken, fish, eggs, and dairy.


One of the main concerns in modern agricultural systems is that high stocking density promotes disease in farm animals. Animals are held in poorly ventilated, damp and feces-covered sheds and pens where infection and disease quickly spread. Farmers then supply antibiotic-laden feed to prevent widespread infection in their livestock and eventual profit losses from sick and dying animals.


The Centre for Disease Control (CDC) has acknowledged that antibiotic use in agriculture significantly
contributes to antibiotic resistance. They state that these medications should only be used where necessary rather than freely fed to animals. In contrast, many wealthy and developed nations condone the use of antibiotics as a preventative measure to offset poor and unsustainable animal husbandry practices. Here in Canada, agriculture accounts for 82% of all antibiotic use


How does this impact human health and food security?


While many claim that antibiotics help farmers produce more sanitary food for human consumption, this is far from reality. As farm animals consume antibiotic medications so frequently, their bodies are full of and covered in resistant bacteria, which
pass into our food during processing


For meat and fish, this contamination occurs during slaughter. In dairy, resistant bacteria and even
antibiotic medications can pass through the animal into the final milk product. Similarly, animal manure is commonly used to fertilize soil, spreading antibiotic-resistant bacteria into crops, fruits, vegetables, and nearby waterways.


While regulations suggest that
animals treated with antibiotics should not be processed for meat or milked within the treatment period, there is no way to guarantee such guidelines are adhered to, and antibiotic-resistant bacteria persist in animals even after treatment ends. 


Eventually, meat and dairy contaminated with antibiotic-resistant bacteria or antimicrobial medications are consumed by humans. Ingestion of Salmonella or Escherichia coli (E.coli) bacteria causes food poisoning, which commonly affects children, pregnant, elderly and immunocompromised peoples. 


While
mild symptoms such as nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting can be treated at home, they are highly infectious and quickly passed on to other humans and pets. In contrast, severe symptoms, including bloody diarrhea, high fever, and dehydration, can be fatal and require medical attention. 


This is where the real implications of antibiotic resistance become evident. Patients with severe infections, including but not limited to food poisoning, require antibiotic treatment. But the abuse of these medications in animal agriculture has propagated resistant bacteria, meaning antibiotics are no longer as effective for treating infections. As a result, the risk of dying from a once treatable infection has significantly increased; and continues to grow with each unsuccessful attempt to manage the infection. 


How can we address the problem? 


We have created a culture and food preferences that revolve around unsustainable and unsafe animal products. Animal agriculture relies on antibiotics to prevent widespread infection and death in livestock, ensuring the propagation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in animals and humans. We can not continue this dangerous and irresponsible use of antibiotics in animal agriculture while ensuring the safety and well-being of the human race. Under our current system, the choice is meat or medication. But what if we could reimagine this choice, and how we produce animal products? 


Cultivated food technology has quickly evolved in previous years. Initially deemed an idealistic solution to many environmental and social issues, this technology is almost ready to produce meat on a global scale. While the minimal ecological and climate impacts of cultivated meat, dairy and fish dominate conversation around the technology, it is an effective solution to growing antibiotic resistance. 


Cultivated meat (fish and dairy) is grown from animal stem cells in a sterile lab environment. This removes the need for antibiotics as no live animals, high stocking densities, bacteria or slaughtering is involved. Many fear cultivated meat technology, claiming it is fake meat full of dangerous chemicals.
This is simply untrue as the growth process only uses animal cells, growth factors and a food source - exactly how meat grows in an animal. 


The potential for cultivated meat to alleviate antibiotic resistance is real and significant, but a lack of government funding and regulation hinders its development. In light of this, Reimagine Agriculture is running an
advocacy campaign asking the Canadian Government to support the development of cultivated meat through investment and regulation. This will ensure that our agri-food system is modernized and will no longer support animal agriculture that propels climate change and antibiotic resistance. We are making progress, but we need your help!

Are you concerned about antibiotic resistance and want to take action? Please consider
volunteering with Reimaging Agriculture. We will train you to speak with your Member of Parliament and guide you through your advocacy journey. 


Don’t worry if you are short on time and can’t volunteer, simply take a moment to
sign our petition and use your voice to fight antibiotic resistance from animal agriculture now!

Together, we can ensure all humans have a healthy, safe and prosperous future!


By Jessica Bohrson at Mercy For Animals November 7, 2024
The 2024 Canada Animal Welfare Scorecard evaluated animal welfare commitments and transparency across 40 leading Canadian food companies. Focusing on cage-free eggs, gestation-crate-free pork, and adherence to Better Chicken Commitment (BCC) standards, the report uncovers serious gaps in transparency, industry-wide “humanewashing,” and persistent animal welfare issues. Here’s a breakdown of the most troubling findings. 1. Lack of Transparency in Major Retailers and Foodservice Providers Walmart Canada, Calgary Co-op, and Federated Co-operatives have demonstrated minimal transparency, failing to publish updates or roadmaps on their animal welfare commitments. Walmart Canada is the only top-five retailer in Canada not reporting any progress on welfare practices, despite publishing incremental updates in the U.S. Meanwhile, Calgary Co-op still lacks any published policies or progress toward ending confinement for hens and pigs, despite its members’ vote to support humane conditions over a decade ago. 2. Misleading Industry Claims and "Humanewashing" Tactics A major issue facing Canadian consumers is the widespread “humanewashing” in the food industry, where companies use misleading labels and terminology to suggest higher animal welfare standards than actually practiced. Companies like Burnbrae Farms label their eggs as “Nestlaid,” implying cage-free conditions, which leads nearly half of surveyed consumers to mistakenly believe these eggs come from open barns. Industry groups, including Chicken Farmers of Canada , amplify this confusion by using terms like “family farms” to evoke images of small, humane operations, even when products are sourced from intensive confinement systems. Rather than improving actual welfare standards, these organizations invest heavily in shaping public opinion through corporate responsibility reports and marketing campaigns, leaving consumers misinformed about the true conditions behind their food. 3. The Crisis of "Frankenchickens" in Poultry Production The Canadian poultry industry’s use of ultrafast-growing birds, often termed “Frankenchickens,” remains a primary welfare issue. These birds are bred to grow four times faster than chickens in the 1950s, resulting in painful health problems and limiting their ability to move or access food and water. Although companies have pledged to stop using these breeds by 2026, few have shown significant action on this front. Major Canadian poultry producers continue to use these breeds, creating severe welfare implications. 4. Continued Use of Gestation Crates for Pigs Gestation crates remain the norm across Canadian pork production, confining mother pigs in cramped stalls that prevent them from turning around. Some progress is evident, with companies like Costco and Starbucks Canada reporting steps toward group housing. However, Walmart Canada and Federated Co-operatives have not published policies or progress. While the industry timeline for complete phase-out stretches to 2029, these companies have yet to implement meaningful welfare improvements, prolonging extreme confinement for Canada’s 1.2 million breeding sows. 5. Slow Progress in the Shift to Cage-Free Eggs Despite growing opposition to cage confinement from Canadian consumers, the Canadian egg industry continues to invest in “enriched” cage systems that offer only minor improvements over conventional battery cages. Companies like Metro and Sobeys committed to sourcing cage-free eggs but report slow progress across their supply chains, while Calgary Co-op has yet to report any steps forward. Globally, over 2,600 companies have committed to eliminating cages, but Canada falls behind due to its reliance on slightly modified cage systems. Moving Forward: Accountability and Clear Roadmaps Required Companies need transparent roadmaps, annual goals, and consistent reporting to keep pace with rising consumer and investor expectations. Brands such as A&W Canada, Aramark, and Panago Pizza have set strong examples, publishing BCC-compliant policies and reporting progress, proving tangible progress is achievable. However, for others, a significant gapremains between public promises and the welfare practices in their supply chains.
By Lauren Rousseau November 5, 2024
Wishing Aleisha good luck for her next adventure
By Lauren Rousseau October 8, 2024
Follow these practical steps this fall; reap the rewards next spring
By Aleisha Pannozzo August 20, 2024
Watch Executive Director Allison dive into the world of cultivated meat
By Opinion by: PJ Nyman, Corporate Engagement Manager, Mercy For Animals Canada February 8, 2024
This blog post is brought to you by friends of Reimagine Agriculture, Mercy For Animals.
By Aleisha Pannozzo October 26, 2023
Header Image Source: Antoine Maillard, New York Times By: Aleisha Pannozzo
By Nicole Gavigan July 14, 2023
By Nicole Gavigan, Education Specialist at Reimagine Agriculture
By Nicole Gavigan July 11, 2023
By Nicole Gavigan, Education Specialist at Reimagine Agriculture
By Lydia Lavis June 23, 2023
By Lydia Lavis, Education Specialist at Reimagine Agriculture
By Nicole Gavigan June 13, 2023
A lot has changed in the last 80 years
More Posts
Share by: