Canada’s Top Egg Producer Just Won’t Let Caging Go

Opinion by: PJ Nyman, Corporate Engagement Manager, Mercy For Animals Canada • February 8, 2024

This blog post is brought to you by friends of Reimagine Agriculture, Mercy For Animals.

When a table at a global summit collectively gasps in shock, you might not expect that Canada is the topic of conversation. But when I joined other professional animal advocates at the largest global chicken welfare summit last fall, Canada’s farm practices surprised and disappointed representatives from around the world.

At my table were reps from Poland, Japan, Australia, and Latin America. As we discussed overcoming barriers to raising industrial farms’ animal welfare standards in our regions, it became clear that when it comes to the well-being of farmed animals, Canada has fallen dangerously behind its peers — and the actions of one company in particular threaten to further undermine Canadian progress.


I’ve worked with Canada’s largest food companies for years to improve animal welfare in their supply chains. Most have already taken action on one of the greatest concerns in farms today: extreme confinement. But more action is needed, as most chickens in the Canadian egg industry still spend their lives in small cages with wire flooring and barely enough room to take a step.


In Canada’s egg farms, 83% of birds suffer in cages, while the UK has reduced its cage use to 25% of production. Why is Canada still caging millions of chickens year after year?

Globally, animal welfare has been elevated as a critical social responsibility of food companies. But in Canada, a uniquely powerful agricultural sector influenced by industry giants like Burnbrae Farms — the country’s largest egg producer — is both unaccountable to the public and undermining its biggest buyers’ public commitments to consumers and investors.


Polls continually show that Canadians care about animal welfare. Industrial animal agriculture may attempt to portray Canadian agriculture as overregulated, but the truth is that Canada has almost no federal laws protecting farmed animals — as years of horrific undercover footage from whistleblowers have made painfully clear.

Companies in Canada, like Unilever, Panago, and even McDonald’s, are joining the wave of businesses around the globe in successfully going cage-free; most major food companies in Canada have committed to phasing out cages by 2025. Many jurisdictions are passing laws making caging chickens illegal. Yet Burnbrae doesn’t even report how many of their chickens are still confined to cages.


Instead, the company offers misleading reports on “alternative housing,” lumping together so-called enriched cages (which are only slightly larger than standard “battery” cages), and cage-free operations. You won’t find the word “cage” in Burnbrae’s latest annual report, even though most of the companies’ chickens still suffer in them.


In recent years, I’ve seen Burnbrae address important social issues, from gender representation in leadership to water conservation, while avoiding the caged chicken in the room. While Canada’s egg industry is expected to phase out conventional battery cages by 2036 — a ban that followed nearly 100 corporate cage-free commitments by 2017 — Canada’s largest egg producer still enables transitions to “enriched” cages as a workaround on the ban. Where Burnbrae should focus on responsibly investing in cage-free systems to meet corporate and consumer demand, they are instead posing roadblocks to companies in implementing better standards for animals.


The data shows that Canadians don’t want bigger cages. They want no cages. More than seven out of 10 Canadians surveyed find enriched cages unacceptable and support a national ban on all cage confinement of chickens. Twenty-seven countries and nine U.S. states have cage-free laws — laws that are supported by over 2,500 corporate cage-free commitments around the world.


As extreme confinement ages into a sad, brutal relic of our global farming history, this is Canada’s moment to take a lead in animal welfare — rather than be shamed into action by other nations. Burnbrae Farms must see what the rest of the world saw at the global summit: It is time to leave behind a cruel system that no one wants.
 



 

PJ Nyman is the corporate engagement manager at Mercy For Animals Canada and holds a master’s degree in social and political theory from York University. 


By Jessica Bohrson at Mercy For Animals November 7, 2024
The 2024 Canada Animal Welfare Scorecard evaluated animal welfare commitments and transparency across 40 leading Canadian food companies. Focusing on cage-free eggs, gestation-crate-free pork, and adherence to Better Chicken Commitment (BCC) standards, the report uncovers serious gaps in transparency, industry-wide “humanewashing,” and persistent animal welfare issues. Here’s a breakdown of the most troubling findings. 1. Lack of Transparency in Major Retailers and Foodservice Providers Walmart Canada, Calgary Co-op, and Federated Co-operatives have demonstrated minimal transparency, failing to publish updates or roadmaps on their animal welfare commitments. Walmart Canada is the only top-five retailer in Canada not reporting any progress on welfare practices, despite publishing incremental updates in the U.S. Meanwhile, Calgary Co-op still lacks any published policies or progress toward ending confinement for hens and pigs, despite its members’ vote to support humane conditions over a decade ago. 2. Misleading Industry Claims and "Humanewashing" Tactics A major issue facing Canadian consumers is the widespread “humanewashing” in the food industry, where companies use misleading labels and terminology to suggest higher animal welfare standards than actually practiced. Companies like Burnbrae Farms label their eggs as “Nestlaid,” implying cage-free conditions, which leads nearly half of surveyed consumers to mistakenly believe these eggs come from open barns. Industry groups, including Chicken Farmers of Canada , amplify this confusion by using terms like “family farms” to evoke images of small, humane operations, even when products are sourced from intensive confinement systems. Rather than improving actual welfare standards, these organizations invest heavily in shaping public opinion through corporate responsibility reports and marketing campaigns, leaving consumers misinformed about the true conditions behind their food. 3. The Crisis of "Frankenchickens" in Poultry Production The Canadian poultry industry’s use of ultrafast-growing birds, often termed “Frankenchickens,” remains a primary welfare issue. These birds are bred to grow four times faster than chickens in the 1950s, resulting in painful health problems and limiting their ability to move or access food and water. Although companies have pledged to stop using these breeds by 2026, few have shown significant action on this front. Major Canadian poultry producers continue to use these breeds, creating severe welfare implications. 4. Continued Use of Gestation Crates for Pigs Gestation crates remain the norm across Canadian pork production, confining mother pigs in cramped stalls that prevent them from turning around. Some progress is evident, with companies like Costco and Starbucks Canada reporting steps toward group housing. However, Walmart Canada and Federated Co-operatives have not published policies or progress. While the industry timeline for complete phase-out stretches to 2029, these companies have yet to implement meaningful welfare improvements, prolonging extreme confinement for Canada’s 1.2 million breeding sows. 5. Slow Progress in the Shift to Cage-Free Eggs Despite growing opposition to cage confinement from Canadian consumers, the Canadian egg industry continues to invest in “enriched” cage systems that offer only minor improvements over conventional battery cages. Companies like Metro and Sobeys committed to sourcing cage-free eggs but report slow progress across their supply chains, while Calgary Co-op has yet to report any steps forward. Globally, over 2,600 companies have committed to eliminating cages, but Canada falls behind due to its reliance on slightly modified cage systems. Moving Forward: Accountability and Clear Roadmaps Required Companies need transparent roadmaps, annual goals, and consistent reporting to keep pace with rising consumer and investor expectations. Brands such as A&W Canada, Aramark, and Panago Pizza have set strong examples, publishing BCC-compliant policies and reporting progress, proving tangible progress is achievable. However, for others, a significant gapremains between public promises and the welfare practices in their supply chains.
By Lauren Rousseau November 5, 2024
Wishing Aleisha good luck for her next adventure
By Lauren Rousseau October 8, 2024
Follow these practical steps this fall; reap the rewards next spring
By Aleisha Pannozzo August 20, 2024
Watch Executive Director Allison dive into the world of cultivated meat
By Aleisha Pannozzo October 26, 2023
Header Image Source: Antoine Maillard, New York Times By: Aleisha Pannozzo
By Nicole Gavigan July 14, 2023
By Nicole Gavigan, Education Specialist at Reimagine Agriculture
By Nicole Gavigan July 11, 2023
By Nicole Gavigan, Education Specialist at Reimagine Agriculture
By Lydia Lavis June 23, 2023
By Lydia Lavis, Education Specialist at Reimagine Agriculture
By Nicole Gavigan June 13, 2023
A lot has changed in the last 80 years
By Lydia Lavis June 7, 2023
By: Lydia Lavis, Education Specialist at Reimagine Agriculture
More Posts
Share by: