From Recommended to Removed: How The Role Of Milk Has Changed Throughout The History Of Canada’s Food Guide

Nicole Gavigan • July 11, 2023

By Nicole Gavigan, Education Specialist at Reimagine Agriculture

Most of us are familiar with Canada’s Food Guide. You probably remember learning about the four different food groups, and their recommended daily servings. But did you know that for many decades, the Guide gave daily serving recommendations for only one food group - dairy! Milk, specifically. 


But wait a second – the newest version of Canada’s Food Guide, released in 2019, doesn’t include a milk category at all. So, how did we get from “Milk: Front and Centre” to “Milk Not Included”? Let’s look at how the role of milk has changed throughout the history of Canada’s Food Guide. 


In 1942, Canada’s very first food guide was published as a set of “Food Rules” to help Canadians stay healthy through wartime food rations and supply shortages. Very little nutrition research was available at the time, and this guide was created more from political and economic motivations, than from actual nutrition science. 


There’s little understanding as to why the 1942 Food Rules were released with specific serving sizes for milk only, although we can speculate that it might have been one way for politicians to limit government spending on food relief payments for families in need. 



Canada’s very first food guide, published in 1942 with specific amounts of milk recommended daily for everyone

The Food Rules were revised in 1944, increasing recommended milk servings to ensure more Canadians met their daily riboflavin requirements. But, still in the midst of World War II, milk supplies remained scarce. Governments strongly pushed messages to conserve food, use less, and waste nothing. 

 

In 1948, a new Dietary Standard for Canada was published, which led to another version of Canada’s Food Rules in 1949. Although the war was now over, food scarcity continued in some regions of the world, and there were still pleas to avoid eating too much. 


Despite this, the words “at least” were added in front of milk serving recommendations, mainly at the request of doctors and nutritionists, who felt that people were unnecessarily limiting their milk intake. Another change was the addition of a new serving recommendation category for milk, for children under the age of 12, also added at the request of healthcare providers.


The next Food Guide, released in 1961, was the first to have specific milk serving recommendations for pregnant and breastfeeding women. The “at least” wording was also removed from milk’s daily recommended servings, perhaps in acknowledgement that supply shortages were long gone, and excessive food intake could be just as much a problem as insufficient intake was a few decades earlier.


The milk recommendations remained largely unchanged for several decades until the release of the 2007 Canada’s Food Guide. Here, the Milk Products group was renamed as Milk and Alternatives to include fortified soy milk, giving Canadians a nutritionally similar plant-based alternative to dairy milk. 


And that brings us to the newest version, released in 2019. For the first time, milk is entirely absent from the visual messaging of Canada’s Food Guide. In fact, other than a small cup of yogurt, there are no dairy products at all in the new Guide’s colourful plate of food. No milk, cheese, cottage cheese, or ice cream are present.

The 2019 version of Canada’s Food Guide is the first with no specific daily milk recommendations

Health Canada hasn’t abandoned milk entirely. The reverse side of the Guide’s plate of food image, seen above, shows glasses of milk in the photos encouraging healthy eating practices, and the website includes advice to choose lower fat dairy products. 


Still, this is a massive change for a nutrition guide that recommended daily servings of milk and dairy for everyone just 16 years ago. Compare the above image of today’s Food Guide with the image below of the previous version.



In 2007, Canada’s Food Guide recommended anywhere from 2 to 4 daily servings of milk or milk products, based on age

Adapted from: Food For Health

So, why this major change? Through the development of past versions of Canada’s Food Guide, the Canadian dairy industry lobbied persistently to keep dairy products front and centre. In fact, a recent study on Canadian nutrition policy from 2016 to 2021 found that the dairy industry lobbied policy-makers more, by far, than any other food or beverage industry.


But, ahead of the development of the most recent 2019 Guide,
restrictions on lobbying were put in place to reduce industry influence on nutrition recommendations. For the first time, Canada’s Food Guide was developed without direct lobbying from the food & beverage industry. 


To learn more about Canada’s newest Food Guide, and its potential impacts on public and environmental health, check out our video series here! Be sure to follow us on social media for updates on our campaigns, and to find out how you can get involved. 

By Jessica Bohrson at Mercy For Animals November 7, 2024
The 2024 Canada Animal Welfare Scorecard evaluated animal welfare commitments and transparency across 40 leading Canadian food companies. Focusing on cage-free eggs, gestation-crate-free pork, and adherence to Better Chicken Commitment (BCC) standards, the report uncovers serious gaps in transparency, industry-wide “humanewashing,” and persistent animal welfare issues. Here’s a breakdown of the most troubling findings. 1. Lack of Transparency in Major Retailers and Foodservice Providers Walmart Canada, Calgary Co-op, and Federated Co-operatives have demonstrated minimal transparency, failing to publish updates or roadmaps on their animal welfare commitments. Walmart Canada is the only top-five retailer in Canada not reporting any progress on welfare practices, despite publishing incremental updates in the U.S. Meanwhile, Calgary Co-op still lacks any published policies or progress toward ending confinement for hens and pigs, despite its members’ vote to support humane conditions over a decade ago. 2. Misleading Industry Claims and "Humanewashing" Tactics A major issue facing Canadian consumers is the widespread “humanewashing” in the food industry, where companies use misleading labels and terminology to suggest higher animal welfare standards than actually practiced. Companies like Burnbrae Farms label their eggs as “Nestlaid,” implying cage-free conditions, which leads nearly half of surveyed consumers to mistakenly believe these eggs come from open barns. Industry groups, including Chicken Farmers of Canada , amplify this confusion by using terms like “family farms” to evoke images of small, humane operations, even when products are sourced from intensive confinement systems. Rather than improving actual welfare standards, these organizations invest heavily in shaping public opinion through corporate responsibility reports and marketing campaigns, leaving consumers misinformed about the true conditions behind their food. 3. The Crisis of "Frankenchickens" in Poultry Production The Canadian poultry industry’s use of ultrafast-growing birds, often termed “Frankenchickens,” remains a primary welfare issue. These birds are bred to grow four times faster than chickens in the 1950s, resulting in painful health problems and limiting their ability to move or access food and water. Although companies have pledged to stop using these breeds by 2026, few have shown significant action on this front. Major Canadian poultry producers continue to use these breeds, creating severe welfare implications. 4. Continued Use of Gestation Crates for Pigs Gestation crates remain the norm across Canadian pork production, confining mother pigs in cramped stalls that prevent them from turning around. Some progress is evident, with companies like Costco and Starbucks Canada reporting steps toward group housing. However, Walmart Canada and Federated Co-operatives have not published policies or progress. While the industry timeline for complete phase-out stretches to 2029, these companies have yet to implement meaningful welfare improvements, prolonging extreme confinement for Canada’s 1.2 million breeding sows. 5. Slow Progress in the Shift to Cage-Free Eggs Despite growing opposition to cage confinement from Canadian consumers, the Canadian egg industry continues to invest in “enriched” cage systems that offer only minor improvements over conventional battery cages. Companies like Metro and Sobeys committed to sourcing cage-free eggs but report slow progress across their supply chains, while Calgary Co-op has yet to report any steps forward. Globally, over 2,600 companies have committed to eliminating cages, but Canada falls behind due to its reliance on slightly modified cage systems. Moving Forward: Accountability and Clear Roadmaps Required Companies need transparent roadmaps, annual goals, and consistent reporting to keep pace with rising consumer and investor expectations. Brands such as A&W Canada, Aramark, and Panago Pizza have set strong examples, publishing BCC-compliant policies and reporting progress, proving tangible progress is achievable. However, for others, a significant gapremains between public promises and the welfare practices in their supply chains.
By Lauren Rousseau November 5, 2024
Wishing Aleisha good luck for her next adventure
By Lauren Rousseau October 8, 2024
Follow these practical steps this fall; reap the rewards next spring
By Aleisha Pannozzo August 20, 2024
Watch Executive Director Allison dive into the world of cultivated meat
By Opinion by: PJ Nyman, Corporate Engagement Manager, Mercy For Animals Canada February 8, 2024
This blog post is brought to you by friends of Reimagine Agriculture, Mercy For Animals.
By Aleisha Pannozzo October 26, 2023
Header Image Source: Antoine Maillard, New York Times By: Aleisha Pannozzo
By Nicole Gavigan July 14, 2023
By Nicole Gavigan, Education Specialist at Reimagine Agriculture
By Lydia Lavis June 23, 2023
By Lydia Lavis, Education Specialist at Reimagine Agriculture
By Nicole Gavigan June 13, 2023
A lot has changed in the last 80 years
By Lydia Lavis June 7, 2023
By: Lydia Lavis, Education Specialist at Reimagine Agriculture
More Posts
Share by: